A New Threat to LGBTQ+ Education in the UK
The recent guidance from the UK government on Relationships, Sex and Health Education (RSHE) has sparked widespread concern among LGBTQ+ communities. One particular line from the guidance states, “Schools should avoid materials that could encourage children to question their gender.” This statement has been met with alarm, as it echoes rhetoric often associated with right-wing political agendas. For many trans individuals, this guidance feels like a step backward, reminiscent of the discriminatory policies of the past.
This new policy is not just a warning sign—it’s a direct threat to the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights over the years. The language used in the guidance suggests an attempt to silence discussions around gender identity in schools, which can have severe consequences for trans and non-binary youth. By framing gender identity as a controversial topic, the guidance risks reinforcing stigma and shame, rather than fostering understanding and acceptance.
A Disturbing Echo of Section 28
The parallels between the current guidance and Section 28, a law introduced in 1988 under the Thatcher government, are impossible to ignore. Section 28 prohibited schools from promoting the acceptability of homosexuality as a family relationship, effectively banning any discussion of LGBTQ+ issues in classrooms. This law had a chilling effect on teachers and students alike, leading to a culture of silence and fear. Many LGBTQ+ individuals who lived through this era still carry the emotional scars of that time.
While I did not grow up in the UK, my partner did. They were directly affected by Section 28, participating in protests against it at the time. Even now, they continue to feel the long-term impact of that policy. The shame and isolation that resulted from such legislation are difficult to articulate, but they remain deeply ingrained in the experiences of those who lived through it.
The Labour Government’s Approach
It seems that the Labour government is repeating the same harmful patterns, this time targeting trans and non-binary young people. The guidance instructs schools to focus only on biological sex and to avoid discussing gender identity. This approach sends a dangerous message: that being transgender is not a valid or acceptable experience. It also implies that teachers should avoid taking any stance on gender issues, which can lead to further marginalization of LGBTQ+ students.
For trans individuals, these statements are not just confusing—they are deeply hurtful. They are dogwhistles designed to signal a lack of support for trans rights. This is not about protecting students; it is about politicizing an issue that should be treated with compassion and respect. The idea that gender identity is too controversial to discuss in schools is not only misguided but also harmful.
The Importance of Inclusive Education
Despite the troubling aspects of the guidance, there are some positive elements that deserve recognition. The document includes more comprehensive information on topics such as consent, online harms, pornography, misogyny, incel culture, and deepfakes. These are important issues that young people need to understand. However, the exclusion of gender identity from the curriculum undermines the overall goal of providing a holistic education.
Inclusive education is essential for building healthy relationships and promoting respect. When schools deny students the opportunity to explore their identities, they are failing them. Young LGBTQ+ individuals deserve to see themselves reflected in the curriculum and to feel safe and supported in their learning environments.
A Call to Action
For parents, it is crucial to ask questions about how schools plan to support their trans children. Parents should inquire about the measures in place to prevent bullying and ensure that their children feel accepted and valued. Teachers also play a vital role in creating inclusive spaces. Their support can make a significant difference in the lives of vulnerable students.
When I came out as trans at 17, my school counsellor was one of the first people I told. Her unwavering support made all the difference. She never made me feel ashamed for who I was, and that moment of acceptance changed my life.
A Future of Resilience
The Labour government may believe that this guidance will help them appear balanced on cultural issues, but the cost is far too high. History has shown us what happens when silence becomes the norm. We must fight back against policies that seek to erase our existence.
Over 100,000 people participated in Trans Pride London, not as a celebration, but as a powerful protest. We are here, and we will not be silenced. No amount of guidance, legislation, or political posturing can change that. The trans community is resilient and proud, and we will continue to stand up for our rights.
As we move forward, the real question remains: How will the Labour government choose to treat us? Just as history remembers the impact of Section 28, it will also remember this chapter.
Leave a Reply